General freight trucking, local · Massachusetts

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc.

Westfield, MA · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. runs at 116% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade C.

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 116% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. safety composite

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc.: 8.1 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2024

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc.'s TCR rose 3.0 from 8.1 in 2017 to 11.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Westfield, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.2 · 116% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #16/43
  • PHOTO WT Gardner & Sons Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WT Gardner & Sons Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (116% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. TCR series: 2017=8.1 · 2018=4 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 4.5

Where R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 43 General freight trucking, loca employers in Massachusetts.

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. (42 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc.
R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. (42 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

R.M. Sullivan Transportation Inc. has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 5.6 4 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2021 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2018 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2017 8.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · MA · Westfield

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 84 employers in Westfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WT Gardner & Sons Inc 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LAC Logistics LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCWCO - COLUMBIA 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAFE COURIERS DELIVERY SERVICE INC. 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kendall 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Utilities Anawan Street 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lendlease Boston 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mass Cabinets Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR BNH - Baystate Noble Hospital 541 FTE
CITY-NEAR CS Wholesale Grocers : Westfield, MA (FDC) 499 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savage Arms, Inc. 405 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2174 401 FTE
NAT-TCR Smithfield Foods 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bus Garage 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton NY FXFE-BGM 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Florida Exterior 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wabtec Manufacturing Solutions TXD 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Library 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scotland County Feed Mill 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Total Electric of MT, LLC 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.