Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · California

RMD Homes, Inc.

Whittier, CA · ~186 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RMD Homes, Inc. runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

RMD Homes, Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 137% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RMD Homes, Inc. safety composite

RMD Homes, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

RMD Homes, Inc.: 5.2 → 180.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 180.6 TCR · DART/TCR 22.06× in 2024

RMD Homes, Inc.'s TCR rose 175.4 from 5.2 in 2023 to 180.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 22.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Whittier, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 137% of ind

  • DART 114.9 DART
  • RANK #136/230
  • PHOTO Coral Reef Management
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~186 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coral Reef Management (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

RMD Homes, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RMD Homes, Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (137% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RMD Homes, Inc. TCR series: 2023=5.2 · 2024=180.6 · BLS 3.8

Where RMD Homes, Inc. falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 230 Activity centers for disabled employers in California.

RMD Homes, Inc. (186 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate RMD Homes, Inc.
RMD Homes, Inc. (186 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

RMD Homes, Inc. has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 180.6 114.9 20 2 0
2023 5.2 4.8 11 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Whittier

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 124 employers in Whittier, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coral Reef Management 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington Co 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bloomfield Community 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Ent Union County NJ 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRIMA NOCE PACKING, INC. 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jorge Castro Farms 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-Redlands Nevada Bldg 186 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Coast Sales and Service, Inc. 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR PIH Health Hospital - Whittier 3,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 499 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PIH Health Hospital - Downey 1,130 FTE
CITY-NEAR PIH Health Physicians 819 FTE
NAT-TCR CrossPoint Polymer Technologies 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kshay - Hays 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR KS Large Bore Piston LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tncol - Columbia 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kaufman Lynn Construction 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nutrition & Biosciences USA 1 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gold Crest Care Center 186 FTE
NAT-SIZE Playcraft Systems LLC 186 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.