Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing · Colorado

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural

Denver, CO · ~91 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural: 3.9 TCR = 117% of Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural safety composite

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2018

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural injury rate improved

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural's TCR fell 3.9 from 5.6 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.6 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327390 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 117% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #11/29
  • PHOTO Atlanta Structural c…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlanta Structural concrete company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural averages 3.9 TCR (117% of the Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural TCR series: 2016=5.6 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural falls in its industry

790 Architectural wall panels, pre establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 29 Architectural wall panels, pre employers in Colorado.

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural (91 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural
Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural (91 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Rocky Mountain Prestress-Architectural has more employees than the Architectural wall panels, precast concr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 4.3 2.9 6 0 0
2016 5.6 4.2 6 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327390 · CO · Denver

790 Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atlanta Structural concrete company 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tindall Corporation - Texas Division 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CXT Precast Buildings 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilbert Funeral Services Inc 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fort Collins Operations Center-400 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Construction & Design Services, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE 501-CO-Westminster 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gregory Electric LLC 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockford 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Glickman Metal Recycling, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LifeSkills Industries-Warren County 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HPD Durham 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brian Center Health & Rehabilitation/Statesville 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Open Door West 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE thyssenkrupp Steel Services - Detroit 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corp. Office 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.