Insulation and cushioning, foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing · Illinois

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream

Carol Stream, IL · ~91 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Insulation and cushioning, foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Insulation and cushioning, foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream safety composite

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream held a steady TCR band

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream's TCR held near 0.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Carol Stream, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #4/20
  • PHOTO Prime Choice Packaging
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prime Choice Packaging (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Insulation and cushioning, foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream falls in its industry

474 Insulation and cushioning, foa establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 20 Insulation and cushioning, foa employers in Illinois.

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream (91 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream
Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream (91 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Rogers Corporation - Carol Stream has more employees than the Insulation and cushioning, foam plastics median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · IL · Carol Stream

474 Insulation and cushioning, foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 170 employers in Carol Stream, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prime Choice Packaging 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICP Construction 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AUSTIN FOAM/SEALED AIR CORP-Dallas 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FXI, Inc. - Chattanooga 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Havana Power Station 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynamic Utility Solutions 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campus Communications Group 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS - East Peroria, IL - 1EPI2 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group 2,151 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Litho, Inc. 1,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 161275-CAROL STREAM IL P&DC 960 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods - Carol Stream 853 FTE
NAT-TCR McDonough Construction Rentals, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MS - Fairbanks, AK - 5FTWA 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stevedoring 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SP Richards HQ 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Legends - Veterans at Virginia Beach 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE GS500 - GSU - Sacramento 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Power Services : Erlanger, KY, USA 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson City (Mojef) 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.