Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Nebraska

Rolling Hills Ranch

Omaha, NE · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rolling Hills Ranch runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Rolling Hills Ranch: 1.8 TCR = 48% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rolling Hills Ranch safety composite

Rolling Hills Ranch scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2017→2022

Rolling Hills Ranch injury rate improved

Rolling Hills Ranch's TCR fell 5.7 from 5.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.7 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Omaha, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/66
  • PHOTO Pram Singing Woods T…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pram Singing Woods TE LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Rolling Hills Ranch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rolling Hills Ranch averages 1.8 TCR (48% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rolling Hills Ranch TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Rolling Hills Ranch falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 66 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Nebraska.

Rolling Hills Ranch (28 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rolling Hills Ranch
Rolling Hills Ranch (28 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Rolling Hills Ranch has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2017 5.7 5.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NE · Omaha

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 1,135 employers in Omaha, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pram Singing Woods TE LLC 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Troy Assisted Living 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Corner Health Care Campus 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hume Home 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Central Sand & Gravel Co - Shop 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sargent Drilling Co 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Iowa/Missouri Region 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Celebrity Homes Inc. 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Drivers Management LLC/Over the Road Drivers 9,373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nebraska Medicine 8,728 FTE
CITY-NEAR FUSION MEDICAL STAFFING, LLC 2,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR 61830001 METHODIST HOSPITAL 2,861 FTE
NAT-TCR Lancaster Mold 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bridge at Paradise Valley 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing Center Wilmington (MCW) 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Deerfield 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Birkey'S Farm Store, Inc. - Urbana 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Plaza 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE TMS Cleveland 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birkey'S Farm Store, Inc. - Galesburg 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.