Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Indiana

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building

Indianapolis, IN · ~113 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building safety composite

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building held a steady TCR band

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/24
  • PHOTO Aviation Other : Vir…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rolls-Royce: ATA Building averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Rolls-Royce: ATA Building falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 24 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Indiana.

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building (113 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Rolls-Royce: ATA Building
Rolls-Royce: ATA Building (113 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Rolls-Royce: ATA Building has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · IN · Indianapolis

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce: Merdian Center 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curtiss-Wright -- Gilbert 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt & Whitney - West Palm Beach FL 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE JDH Contracting, Inc 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKinley Packaging 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilchrist & Soames Plainfield, IN 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Packaging International/Polycon Industries, Inc. 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TX-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakewest SNF Operations, LLC D/B/A Lakewest Rehabilitation and Skilled Care 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Matthews Leasing, LLC 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milwaukee- 01 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Supor Blvd 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.