Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Michigan

Ronnisch Construction Group

Royal Oak, MI · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ronnisch Construction Group runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Ronnisch Construction Group: 1.0 TCR = 34% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ronnisch Construction Group safety composite

Ronnisch Construction Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Ronnisch Construction Group held a steady TCR band

Ronnisch Construction Group's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Royal Oak, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/121
  • PHOTO TCCo-NYN
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TCCo-NYN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Ronnisch Construction Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ronnisch Construction Group averages 1.0 TCR (34% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ronnisch Construction Group TCR series: 2016=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Ronnisch Construction Group falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 121 Construction management, comme employers in Michigan.

Ronnisch Construction Group (34 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ronnisch Construction Group
Ronnisch Construction Group (34 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Ronnisch Construction Group has fewer employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MI · Royal Oak

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 51 employers in Royal Oak, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TCCo-NYN 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Healthcare 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cody Vermette Group, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR YUHSD - Somerton High School 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE GS Ashley LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sportel Greenhouses, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coldwater 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dearborn Industrial Generation LLC 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-300 9,436 FTE
CITY-NEAR Royal Oak. 367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flex-N- Gate Royal Oak, LLC. 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR 018-00743 268 FTE
NAT-TCR National Flange & Fitting Co 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Midstate Plumbing and Heating, INC. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Natori Company 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Towneplace Suites Indianapolis Downtown 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Keith Titus Corp 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Josh Tollett Masonry Company 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Syzygy Plasmonics 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sharon SC 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.