Building exterior cleaning services (except sand blasting, window cleaning) · Minnesota

Roof To Deck Restoration

St Paul, MN · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roof To Deck Restoration runs at 334% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building exterior cleaning services (except sand blasting, window cleaning) workplace, earning a grade F.

Roof To Deck Restoration: 15.0 TCR = 334% of Building exterior cleaning services (except sand blasting, window cleaning) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roof To Deck Restoration safety composite

Roof To Deck Restoration scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2017→2022

Roof To Deck Restoration injury rate improved

Roof To Deck Restoration's TCR fell 4.9 from 14.6 in 2017 to 9.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.6 · 2018=22.6 · 2019=17.2 · 2020=11.1 · 2022=9.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561790 · St Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.0 · 334% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Boston's Best Chimney
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boston's Best Chimney (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Roof To Deck Restoration in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roof To Deck Restoration averages 15.0 TCR (334% of the Building exterior cleaning services (except sand blasting, window cleaning) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roof To Deck Restoration TCR series: 2017=14.6 · 2018=22.6 · 2019=17.2 · 2020=11.1 · 2022=9.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Roof To Deck Restoration falls in its industry

171 Building exterior cleaning ser establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Building exterior cleaning ser employers in Minnesota.

Roof To Deck Restoration (40 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Roof To Deck Restoration
Roof To Deck Restoration (40 employees, TCR 15.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Roof To Deck Restoration has fewer employees than the Building exterior cleaning services (exc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.7 3.2 3 0 0
2020 11.1 5.5 4 0 0
2019 17.2 12.3 6 1 0
2018 22.6 12.9 4 3 0
2017 14.6 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561790 · MN · St Paul

171 Building exterior cleaning services (except sand blasting, window cleaning) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boston's Best Chimney 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advantage Pro Services, Inc. 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Groves Ocean Blue 15.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warehouse 15.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE FDML TW Shop - SE 0010 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Eye Feedmill 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forsman Farms HL 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perham Breeders 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Prairie Living at Chautauqua 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-01756 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-AHSCM14 15.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 357161-Rvc-Oceanside Br 15.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohno Construction Company WA 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0825 CTI Foods - Wilder 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG568 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG579 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.