Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Rose Court Senior Living

Phoenix, AZ · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rose Court Senior Living runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Rose Court Senior Living: 9.3 TCR = 245% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rose Court Senior Living safety composite

Rose Court Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2016→2022

Rose Court Senior Living injury rate improved

Rose Court Senior Living's TCR fell 5.8 from 8.7 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=16.2 · 2022=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 245% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #92/173
  • PHOTO Sienna Crest Assiste…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sienna Crest Assisted Living Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Rose Court Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rose Court Senior Living averages 9.3 TCR (245% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rose Court Senior Living TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=16.2 · 2022=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Rose Court Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Rose Court Senior Living (54 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rose Court Senior Living
Rose Court Senior Living (54 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Rose Court Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 16.2 5.4 6 0 0
2016 8.7 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Phoenix

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sienna Crest Assisted Living Inc 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCP Delray Beach FL OpCo, LLC 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage-5, LLC 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63224 SUNRISE OF ROSEVILLE 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Metropolitan Domestic Water Improvement District 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE KB Home Tucson 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lloyd 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hobaica 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR 556594-Princeton Po 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 4765-MIACC0470 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-MIDET210 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Darling Ingredients Dallas, TX 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piggly Wiggly #278 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6299-MN003 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summer Village Magnolia Place 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Board of Education - Central Kitchen 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.