Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers · Texas

Rose Metal Processing

Houston, TX · ~38 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rose Metal Processing runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Rose Metal Processing: 2.1 TCR = 94% of Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rose Metal Processing safety composite

Rose Metal Processing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2017→2023

Rose Metal Processing injury rate improved

Rose Metal Processing's TCR fell 6.2 from 6.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.1 · 94% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/101
  • PHOTO Colorado Iron & Meta…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Colorado Iron & Metal, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Rose Metal Processing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rose Metal Processing averages 2.1 TCR (94% of the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rose Metal Processing TCR series: 2017=6.2 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Rose Metal Processing falls in its industry

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automot establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 101 Scrap materials (e.g., automot employers in Texas.

Rose Metal Processing (38 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Rose Metal Processing
Rose Metal Processing (38 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Rose Metal Processing has fewer employees than the Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, indus median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2017 6.2 3.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · TX · Houston

1,126 Scrap materials (e.g., automotive, industrial) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Colorado Iron & Metal, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt Recycling Nashville,TN. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saul Goode Industries 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt Recycling Shreveport,LA. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT BREEDER AND BROILER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Agricultural- Danevang 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2362/3714-Lubbock, TX-R&D (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Cheyenne WY - Walmart-DOT 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Decatur Mack 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Vannph-Jov-Aatc Newport News Php 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office - 01 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Homeland 170 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pal-Serv of Charlotte 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE ReTrans (FAVR-6463) 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heany Industries, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.