Prefabricated commercial building erection · Pennsylvania

Rose Metal Systems Inc.

Carlisle, PA · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rose Metal Systems Inc. runs at 365% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Prefabricated commercial building erection workplace, earning a grade F.

Rose Metal Systems Inc.: 10.6 TCR = 365% of Prefabricated commercial building erection BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rose Metal Systems Inc. safety composite

Rose Metal Systems Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2016→2023

Rose Metal Systems Inc. injury rate improved

Rose Metal Systems Inc.'s TCR fell 11.6 from 11.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 29.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.6 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=29.1 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Carlisle, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 365% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #243/251
  • PHOTO RD Builders
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RD Builders (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Rose Metal Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rose Metal Systems Inc. averages 10.6 TCR (365% of the Prefabricated commercial building erection BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rose Metal Systems Inc. TCR series: 2016=11.6 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=29.1 · 2021=10.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Rose Metal Systems Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Prefabricated commercial build establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #243 safest of 251 Prefabricated commercial build employers in Pennsylvania.

Rose Metal Systems Inc. (24 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rose Metal Systems Inc.
Rose Metal Systems Inc. (24 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Rose Metal Systems Inc. has fewer employees than the Prefabricated commercial building erecti median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.4 5.2 2 0 0
2020 29.1 4.2 7 0 0
2019 18.9 7.5 5 0 0
2018 11.5 3.8 3 0 0
2017 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 11.6 3.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Carlisle

4,692 Prefabricated commercial building erection employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 165 employers in Carlisle, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RD Builders 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cresco Building Service Inc 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICV Construction, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Scenic Ridge Company 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avon Heights Mushrooms, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waynesburg PA 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Electric Power LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenaska Westmoreland Generating Station 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp Office Carlisle PA 1,191 FTE
CITY-NEAR DB Schenker--Carlisle 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCM 984 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACAS - CARLISLE 902 FTE
NAT-TCR Elyria Concrete 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Laser Machining 2 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ZD Metal Products 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Oaks at Northpointe 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Assisted Living 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern California Plastics 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northwest Framing Systems 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kirby Risk Mechanical Solutions and Services 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.