Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek

Brandon, FL · ~50 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek runs at 255% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek: 9.7 TCR = 255% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek safety composite

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2023

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek injury rate improved

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek's TCR fell 3.5 from 10.9 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2017=15.2 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=7.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Brandon, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 255% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #279/396
  • PHOTO Discovery Village at…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Discovery Village at Westchase (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosecastle at Delaney Creek averages 9.7 TCR (255% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2017=15.2 · 2018=8.3 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=7.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Rosecastle at Delaney Creek falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #279 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek (50 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosecastle at Delaney Creek
Rosecastle at Delaney Creek (50 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Rosecastle at Delaney Creek has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.4 2.5 3 0 0
2022 12.9 5.2 5 0 0
2021 8.4 5.6 3 0 0
2020 7.9 5.3 2 1 0
2019 6.7 2.2 2 1 0
2018 8.3 0.0 4 0 0
2017 15.2 10.8 7 0 0
2016 10.9 4.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Brandon

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 96 employers in Brandon, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Discovery Village at Westchase 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chesterfield, Elmcroft of 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monarch Place 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vintage Park of Gardner 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushnell 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods Lake City 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & M Packing LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walton Service Center 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hillsborough Service Center 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Brandon Hospital 1,745 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brandon Regional Hospital 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brandon Call Center 468 FTE
NAT-TCR Payrk - Market Street Center 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR A Raymond Tinnerman Automotive Inc 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Renaissance Worthington Hotel 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR City of East Dubuque 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodbury Estates 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bradway Trucking 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom One Painting 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Auburn 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.