Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Rosecastle at Jacksonville

Jacksonville, FL · ~52 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosecastle at Jacksonville runs at 376% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Rosecastle at Jacksonville: 14.3 TCR = 376% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosecastle at Jacksonville safety composite

Rosecastle at Jacksonville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2019→2021

Rosecastle at Jacksonville injury rate improved

Rosecastle at Jacksonville's TCR fell 4.5 from 11.4 in 2019 to 6.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.4 · 2020=24.5 · 2021=6.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Jacksonville, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.3 · 376% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #354/396
  • PHOTO The Bristal at Lake …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Bristal at Lake Grove (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Rosecastle at Jacksonville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosecastle at Jacksonville averages 14.3 TCR (376% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosecastle at Jacksonville TCR series: 2019=11.4 · 2020=24.5 · 2021=6.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Rosecastle at Jacksonville falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #354 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Rosecastle at Jacksonville (52 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosecastle at Jacksonville
Rosecastle at Jacksonville (52 employees, TCR 14.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Rosecastle at Jacksonville has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.9 0.0 2 0 0
2020 24.5 21.8 1 8 0
2019 11.4 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Jacksonville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Bristal at Lake Grove 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Oaks Senior Living 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Medical Center Whitby 14.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecumenical Communities (Managed by Country Meadows Retirement Communities - a GML Family Corp. 14.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE L&M Farms of South Florida, LLC-Labelle 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Farms, LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trulieve Telogia Creek. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dewar Nurseries, Inc. Mount Dora 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR 563425-Mil-Greenfield Br 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NM Amb - Faribault 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dollar Tree (WC USX DSC) 14.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CBH Travel Center 14.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - OMH 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lile Relocation Services - Eugene Branch 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE All In One/Moore Insulation #325 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE OJ Insulation #876 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.