Retirement communities, continuing care · Texas

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care

Humble, TX · ~89 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care runs at 119% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care: 4.5 TCR = 119% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care safety composite

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−76.4

2017→2022

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care injury rate improved

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care's TCR fell 76.4 from 82.1 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 82.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=82.1 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=3.4 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Humble, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 119% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #88/220
  • PHOTO Sterling Heights Ret…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sterling Heights Retirement Residence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care averages 4.5 TCR (119% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care TCR series: 2017=82.1 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=3.4 · 2021=3 · 2022=5.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 220 Retirement communities, contin employers in Texas.

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care (89 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care
Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care (89 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Rosemont Assisted Living & Memory Care has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.7 1.9 3 0 0
2021 3.0 1.8 5 0 0
2019 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2018 6.1 3.0 4 0 0
2017 82.1 58.6 5 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TX · Humble

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 174 employers in Humble, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sterling Heights Retirement Residence 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Stillwater 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenville Place 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Village at Ocotillo 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amycel, LLC & Spawn Mate-Madisonville 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ovintiv USA Inc. - Eagle Ford Office 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE ES/Roustabout Division - 04 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE ODESSA TRANSMISSION 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAHCC0170 IAH - CARGO 2,067 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAHCX9575 IAH - UPS B19575 1,699 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hermann Northeast Hospital 958 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU1 894 FTE
NAT-TCR 1067 - Hackettstown 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 787 - Jacksonville SE 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Asenzya Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph's/Candler Pooler 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Industries of Greater NE - Corporate Office 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trident - San Diego Repair 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE Katalyst Surgical LLC 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1350 - Blue Springs 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.