Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) bodies manufacturing · Minnesota

Rosenbauer Motors LLC

Wyoming, MN · ~172 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosenbauer Motors LLC runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) bodies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Rosenbauer Motors LLC: 6.4 TCR = 193% of Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) bodies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosenbauer Motors LLC safety composite

Rosenbauer Motors LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rosenbauer Motors LLC: 6.9 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2024

Rosenbauer Motors LLC's TCR rose 1.9 from 6.9 in 2018 to 8.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336211 · Wyoming, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #3/10
  • PHOTO KTH Leesburg Product…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KTH Leesburg Products LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Rosenbauer Motors LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosenbauer Motors LLC averages 6.4 TCR (193% of the Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) bodies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosenbauer Motors LLC TCR series: 2018=6.9 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.7 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Rosenbauer Motors LLC falls in its industry

470 Special purpose highway vehicl establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 10 Special purpose highway vehicl employers in Minnesota.

Rosenbauer Motors LLC (172 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosenbauer Motors LLC
Rosenbauer Motors LLC (172 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Rosenbauer Motors LLC has more employees than the Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 5.6 13 1 0
2022 2.7 1.3 4 0 0
2021 5.5 3.7 7 2 0
2020 8.1 5.6 13 0 0
2018 6.9 2.3 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336211 · MN · Wyoming

470 Special purpose highway vehicle (e.g., firefighting vehicles) bodies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 23 employers in Wyoming, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KTH Leesburg Products LLC 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR VT Hackney, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandFX, LLC - Pocahontas 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auto Truck Colorado Springs 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agropur Inc. - Le Sueur Cheese 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kent Precision Foods Group- Foley 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Paul, MN 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE NORTH AMERICAN COMPOSITES COMPANY 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakes Medical Center 879 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosenbauer Minnesota 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakes Gas Co 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Premier Marine, LLC 123 FTE
NAT-TCR NB Farms, Inc 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal-Weld Specialties Inc 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Palew - Lewistown 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR San Joaquin County Department of Behavioral Health Services 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Scotland Road Market, Inc. 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iljol - Joliet 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nmsfe - Santa Fe Center 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Txabi - Abilene 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.