Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work · California

Rosendin - Main

San Jose, CA · ~6,964 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosendin - Main runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

Rosendin - Main: 0.8 TCR = 27% of Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosendin - Main safety composite

Rosendin - Main scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rosendin - Main held a steady TCR band

Rosendin - Main's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.9 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.9 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.6 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #53/548
  • PHOTO Team Electric Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 286 inj
  • SIZE ~6,964 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Team Electric Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rosendin - Main in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosendin - Main averages 0.8 TCR (27% of the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosendin - Main TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.6 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Rosendin - Main falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 548 Electrical, electrical wiring, employers in California.

Rosendin - Main (6,964 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosendin - Main
Rosendin - Main (6,964 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Rosendin - Main has more employees than the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low v median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.8 0.5 60 0 1
2022 0.6 0.3 45 0 1
2021 0.9 0.6 60 0 0
2019 0.6 0.3 39 0 0
2018 0.7 0.4 37 0 0
2017 0.9 0.6 45 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · San Jose

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Team Electric Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.J. Moore Electric, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BK Electric LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Starr Electric Company, Inc Charlotte 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE HEADQUARTERS: COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS 6,971 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oracle America, Inc. 6,944 FTE
STATE-SIZE Netflix Productions, LLC - California STEs 6,873 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawthorne, CA 7,104 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC) 6,344 FTE
NAT-TCR Ragland Mills, Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR IDEX Health & Science LLC (COE) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcom Automatics 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ansco Machine Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chicago Area Consolidation Hub (Ilhod) 6,953 FTE
NAT-SIZE James Madison University 6,991 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hackensack University Medical Center 7,005 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.