Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Pennsylvania

Roser Technologies Inc.

Name: Roser Technologies Inc. Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Titusville, PA · ~138 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 7.3
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roser Technologies Inc. runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Roser Technologies Inc.: 7.3 TCR = 220% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roser Technologies Inc. safety composite

Roser Technologies Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 7.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers
DART rate: D 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Roser Technologies Inc.: 5.6 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2021

Roser Technologies Inc.'s TCR rose 3.3 from 5.6 in 2020 to 8.9 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Titusville, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 220% of ind

DART 2.1 DART
RANK #17/27
PHOTO HHC IL Plant
BOOK 2y book
INJ 20 inj
SIZE ~138 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HHC IL Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

This site

7.3
HHC IL Plant

7.3
Main Steel - R

7.3
Micron Industr

7.3
Westfield Elec

7.2

What this shows Roser Technologies Inc. averages 7.3 TCR (220% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Roser Technologies Inc. TCR series: 2020=5.6 · 2021=8.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Roser Technologies Inc. falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 27 Electroplating metals and form employers in Pennsylvania.

Roser Technologies Inc. (138 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Roser Technologies Inc. has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2021	8.9	2.1	13	0	0
2020	5.6	0.0	7	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · PA · Titusville

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 35 employers in Titusville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	HHC IL Plant	ELK GROVE VILLAGE, IL	7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Westfield Electroplating Company	WESTFIELD, MA	7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Main Steel - Riverside	RIVERSIDE, CA	7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Micron Industries, LLC	GARLAND, TX	7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Jushi	SCRANTON	138 FTE
STATE-SIZE	IMC Construction - Malvern	MALVERN	138 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Heavy & Environmental Construction	STATE COLLEGE	138 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Gulisek Construction LLC	MT. PLEASANT	138 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Titusville-Baillie Lumber	Titusville	346 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Titusville Area Hospital	Titusville	266 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 5360	Titusville	182 FTE
CITY-NEAR	5360	Titusville	179 FTE
NAT-TCR	Temps Plus Inc.	Dalton, GA	7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Washington DC	Lanham, MD	7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sam's Furniture	Springdale, AR	7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Rehabilitation Center of Winter Park	Maitland, FL	7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Center for Medical Arts	Carbondale, IL	138 FTE
NAT-SIZE	West Babylon ShopRite #835	West Babylon, NY	138 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Grus Services LLC _Field	Tampa, FL	138 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Gold Dust West - Elko	Elko, NV	138 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.