Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · New York

Roseton Generating LLC

Newburgh, NY · ~54 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roseton Generating LLC runs at 284% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade F.

Roseton Generating LLC: 3.4 TCR = 284% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roseton Generating LLC safety composite

Roseton Generating LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Roseton Generating LLC: 0.0 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

Roseton Generating LLC's TCR rose 5.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Newburgh, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.4 · 284% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #23/29
  • PHOTO 01 - KIUC - Eleele P…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 01 - KIUC - Eleele Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Roseton Generating LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roseton Generating LLC averages 3.4 TCR (284% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roseton Generating LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.7 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=6 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Roseton Generating LLC falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 29 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in New York.

Roseton Generating LLC (54 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Roseton Generating LLC
Roseton Generating LLC (54 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Roseton Generating LLC has fewer employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 3.8 2 1 0
2023 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2022 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 6.5 4.3 3 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 5.1 1.7 2 1 0
2017 1.7 1.7 0 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NY · Newburgh

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 104 employers in Newburgh, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 01 - KIUC - Eleele Power Plant 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thomas B. Fitzhugh Generating Station 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Utilities Commission 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Labadie Plant 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lincoln Dairy 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kast Farms Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. 30th Street Substation 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Briarcliff Service Yard 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Cornwall Hospital- Newburgh 1,231 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Cornwall Hospital-Newburgh 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Empress Ambulance Services Inc. South 632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent Home Care, Inc. 487 FTE
NAT-TCR Ponce 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 029 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitmore Lake 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RFT 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Standard Industrial Corp. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Page Honda of Bloomfield 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE DIT 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crockett Electric Co. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.