Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) · California

Roseville Campus

Roseville, CA · ~667 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roseville Campus runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) workplace, earning a grade A.

Roseville Campus: 0.8 TCR = 20% of Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roseville Campus safety composite

Roseville Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2017→2023

Roseville Campus injury rate improved

Roseville Campus's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.0 in 2017 to 0.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.0 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #3/141
  • PHOTO Agency with Choice
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~667 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Agency with Choice (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Roseville Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roseville Campus averages 0.8 TCR (20% of the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roseville Campus TCR series: 2017=1 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.4 · 2023=0.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Roseville Campus falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or h establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 141 Vocational rehabilitation or h employers in California.

Roseville Campus (667 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Roseville Campus
Roseville Campus (667 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Roseville Campus has more employees than the Vocational rehabilitation or habilitatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2022 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2021 1.2 1.0 6 0 0
2020 1.4 0.9 6 0 0
2019 0.9 0.9 5 0 0
2018 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · CA · Roseville

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation or habilitation services (e.g., job counseling, job training, work experience) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Agency with Choice 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ServiceSource NGA 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WIB Sedalia 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monterey Mushrooms, LLC. 667 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 11 667 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodland Plant 667 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAJOS - SAN JOSE 667 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit #0424 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Albuquerque 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Eaton Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro-Fab LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CR Employment, Inc 667 FTE
NAT-SIZE Catawba 667 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmer Terminal-DOT 667 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carlson Building Maintenance Corporate Office 667 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.