Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise · California

Roseville Distribution Center - 49

Roseville, CA · ~152 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.1
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roseville Distribution Center - 49 runs at 329% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade F.

Roseville Distribution Center - 49: 19.1 TCR = 329% of Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roseville Distribution Center - 49 safety composite

Roseville Distribution Center - 49 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Roseville Distribution Center - 49: 20.0 → 25.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 25.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2022

Roseville Distribution Center - 49's TCR rose 5.9 from 20.0 in 2017 to 25.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Roseville, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 19.1 · 329% of ind

  • DART 25.1 DART
  • RANK #1118/1131
  • PHOTO Genesis - San Diego …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 126 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Genesis - San Diego (MRU2449) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Roseville Distribution Center - 49 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roseville Distribution Center - 49 averages 19.1 TCR (329% of the Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roseville Distribution Center - 49 TCR series: 2017=20 · 2019=13.4 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=24.7 · 2022=25.9 · BLS 5.8

Where Roseville Distribution Center - 49 falls in its industry

9,477 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1118 safest of 1131 Private warehousing and storag employers in California.

Roseville Distribution Center - 49 (152 employees, TCR 19.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Roseville Distribution Center - 49
Roseville Distribution Center - 49 (152 employees, TCR 19.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Roseville Distribution Center - 49 has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage, general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 25.9 25.1 25 7 0
2021 24.7 24.7 36 2 0
2020 11.4 11.4 18 0 0
2019 13.4 12.8 23 1 0
2017 20.0 20.0 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Roseville

9,477 Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Genesis - San Diego (MRU2449) 19.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Intermountain Distribution Center - 57 19.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PDX6 19.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 002465-120-SHEP ECOM OB FFL-DC 19.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE LangeTwins Inc. 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sorrento Berry Farms, LLC - Lompoc 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE MT. VIEW PRODUCTION 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE MATEOS LABOR SERVICE INC. 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Prospect Foundry LLC 19.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 2073-SW-20730075-RA-SW 19.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 287179-Stl-Chouteau Sta 19.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Guar Resources LLC 19.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4598-Rtc Oklahoma City 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #17 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Westlake 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bosque Disposal Systems LLC 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.