Skilled Nursing Facility · California

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness

Roseville, CA · ~165 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled Nursing Facility workplace, earning a grade C.

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness: 6.0 TCR = 92% of Skilled Nursing Facility BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness safety composite

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2024

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness injury rate improved

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness's TCR fell 4.0 from 10.0 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.0 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=6.8 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #227/739
  • PHOTO Pioneer Care
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pioneer Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness averages 6.0 TCR (92% of the Skilled Nursing Facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness TCR series: 2017=10 · 2018=6.2 · 2019=6.8 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=6 · BLS 6.5

Where Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #227 safest of 739 Skilled Nursing Facility employers in California.

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness (165 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness
Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness (165 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Roseville Point Healthcare and Wellness has more employees than the Skilled Nursing Facility median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 4.5 8 0 0
2023 5.7 5.7 3 0 0
2022 3.8 3.8 2 2 0
2021 3.2 2.1 3 0 0
2019 6.8 2.9 7 0 0
2018 6.2 5.2 5 1 0
2017 10.0 7.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Roseville

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Care 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PF Baybrooke SNF Ops, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fair View Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carthage Health and Rehabilitation Center 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Golden State Harvesting, Inc. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kay Dix, Inc. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Labor Services Inc 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE ANTIOCH SERVICE CENTER 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Pinnacle HR Group, LLC - Highland Creek 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR L.S.S. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Barton Creek Senior Living Inc 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BC Motors LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northwest Contracting Inc 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dart Warehouse Corporation - Aurora 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Factor Sales, Inc. Del Sol 11 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE CTUSA-MP 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.