Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Rosewood Estates

Name: Rosewood Estates Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Tyler, TX · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 7.4
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosewood Estates runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Rosewood Estates: 7.4 TCR = 195% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosewood Estates safety composite

Rosewood Estates scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 7.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.5

2019→2022

Rosewood Estates injury rate improved

Rosewood Estates's TCR fell 16.5 from 16.5 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=16.5 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tyler, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 195% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #274/470
PHOTO Centennial Pointe
BOOK 3y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Centennial Pointe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

This site

7.4
Centennial Poi

7.4
Ivy Park at Tu

7.4
Ivy Park at Wa

7.4
Ilima at Leiha

7.4

What this shows Rosewood Estates averages 7.4 TCR (195% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Rosewood Estates TCR series: 2019=16.5 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Rosewood Estates falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #274 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Rosewood Estates (22 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Rosewood Estates has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	0.0	0.0	0
2021	5.7	5.7	1
2019	16.5	11.0	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Tyler

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 357 employers in Tyler, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Centennial Pointe	SPRINGFIELD, IL	7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Ivy Park at Tustin	TUSTIN, CA	7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Ivy Park at Walnut Creek	WALNUT CREEK, CA	7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Ilima at Leihano	KAPOLEI, HI	7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Matador Ranch	MATADOR	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Wheeler Land & Livestock, LLC	WHEELER	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Diamond B Feedyard, LLC	TULIA	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Luckey Custom Feedlot, Inc.	DEVINE	22 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tyler - CTMF 380	Tyler	3,897 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tyler Main Hospital	Tyler	2,205 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Tyler,TX-USA	Tyler	2,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Trinity Clinic - CTMF 381	Tyler	1,705 FTE
NAT-TCR	Gaytan Farrowing 47117 -Est	Unionville, MO	7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	1172 - Baton Rouge La Whse	Baton Rouge, LA	7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	Unc Rockingham Med	Eden, NC	7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR	WDOH01	Lockbourne, OH	7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Broekema Beltway USA, Inc. - CA	Woodland, CA	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Sterling Place	Southfield, MI	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	McLean County Facilities Management	Bloomington, IL	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	1702 Long Term Care Pharmacy	Sauk Rapids, MN	22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.