Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing · Michigan

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC

Battle Creek, MI · ~77 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC safety composite

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2019→2024

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC injury rate improved

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC's TCR fell 3.1 from 6.2 in 2019 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.2 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Battle Creek, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #38/58
  • PHOTO Mold Base Industries…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mold Base Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC TCR series: 2019=6.2 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC falls in its industry

391 Buffing and polishing machines establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 58 Buffing and polishing machines employers in Michigan.

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC (77 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC
Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC (77 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Rosler Metal Finishing USA, LLC - BC has more employees than the Buffing and polishing machines, metalwor median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2019 6.2 6.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · MI · Battle Creek

391 Buffing and polishing machines, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 161 employers in Battle Creek, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mold Base Industries, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Argo Products Company, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simmons Machine Tool Corporation 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Broomfield Laboratories Inc 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chippewa County Road Commission 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE M&M Excavating Co., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Selge Construction Co., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE C & R Electric - Main Office 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Denso Manufacturing of Michigan 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRONSON BATTLE CREEK 1,530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Battle Creek HQ Corporate Office 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR I I Stanley Co., Inc. 729 FTE
NAT-TCR Behavioral Health 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Associated Steel Fabricators, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gordini USA Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR U of NM - La Posada 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Capitol Sand & Gravel Main Yard 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kre-Bsl Husky Mystic Operation LLC 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE ICSC2 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Hotels by Marriott Seattle Everett 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.