Distribution of electric power · North Dakota

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Dickinson, ND · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade B.

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 75% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. safety composite

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2022→2024

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. injury rate improved

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Dickinson, ND AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.9 · 75% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/18
  • PHOTO Helena Service Center
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Helena Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (75% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. TCR series: 2022=2.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 18 Distribution of electric power employers in North Dakota.

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. (38 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Roughrider Electric Cooperative, Inc. has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · ND · Dickinson

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 80 employers in Dickinson, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Helena Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caniff Service Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PARKLAND LIGHT & WATER 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MNE Northest Service Center Strm 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valence Natural Gas Solutions LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomsen Homes LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rusco Window Co Inc 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5261_11902 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Killdeer Mountain Manufacturing, Inc. Dickinson facility 405 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1567 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR Herberger's 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steffes Solutions LLC - Dickinson 341 FTE
NAT-TCR Service Painting Corporation 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Muscatine Store and Helms Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR United Contractors Building Corp. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Vital Consulting Group 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE AC Plastiques USA 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Plains Veterinary Supply of West Plains, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality One Woodwork 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.