Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · North Carolina

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants

Semora, NC · ~193 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants runs at 4% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade A.

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants: 0.1 TCR = 4% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants safety composite

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants held a steady TCR band

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Semora, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 4% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/20
  • PHOTO Calpine Energy Solut…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Calpine Energy Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants averages 0.1 TCR (4% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 20 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in North Carolina.

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants (193 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants
Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants (193 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Roxboro Fossil and CT Plants has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NC · Semora

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 7 employers in Semora, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Calpine Energy Solutions 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arena Building 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Corporate Headquarters Bldg 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Office 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Essentra HCP Greensboro 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global Charlotte 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2967-NC127 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bosch Rexroth Plant 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke Energy HYCO 144 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Construction Group Inc Duke Roxboro 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR CertainTeed Gypsum Roxboro 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Duke Energy - Semora 64 FTE
NAT-TCR Badger Evergreen Nursery LLC 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR USA San Francisco (1515 3rd St - MB2) 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR SKF USA Inc. - Lansdale 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lenthor Engineering 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regal Rexnord 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE 285 - Terre Haute IN 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Den Denver International Airport 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.