Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Texas

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc

San Antonio, TX · ~132 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc runs at 250% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade F.

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc: 9.5 TCR = 250% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc safety composite

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.4

2020→2024

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc injury rate improved

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc's TCR fell 10.4 from 15.0 in 2020 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=15.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=13.9 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 250% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #26/33
  • PHOTO Snell Farm
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 80 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Snell Farm (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc averages 9.5 TCR (250% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc TCR series: 2020=15 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=13.9 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 33 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Texas.

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc (132 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc
Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc (132 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Roy Maas Youth Alternatives, Inc has more employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.6 8 0 0
2023 10.1 10.1 11 0 0
2022 13.9 13.9 21 0 0
2021 3.9 3.0 18 0 0
2020 15.0 15.0 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · TX · San Antonio

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Snell Farm 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4287_14290 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 482412 130031_CYPRESS_ABI 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Board of Child Care 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tolk/Plant X Station 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paragon 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arch-Con Corporation - Houston 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Village of Berkeley 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Guc Gunnison County Airport 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CFR Phoenix 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Elk Mound Service Center 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alliance Health at Rosewood 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kinbro Inc. 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midnight Harvest 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clayton Properties Group, Inc. dba Highland Homes 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.