Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing · Tennessee

Royal Building Products - Bristol

Bristol, TN · ~178 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Royal Building Products - Bristol runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Royal Building Products - Bristol: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Royal Building Products - Bristol safety composite

Royal Building Products - Bristol scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2021

Royal Building Products - Bristol injury rate improved

Royal Building Products - Bristol's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Bristol, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/66
  • PHOTO Harbec
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harbec (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Royal Building Products - Bristol in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Royal Building Products - Bristol averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Royal Building Products - Bristol TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Royal Building Products - Bristol falls in its industry

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fasc establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 66 Building materials (e.g., fasc employers in Tennessee.

Royal Building Products - Bristol (178 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Royal Building Products - Bristol
Royal Building Products - Bristol (178 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Royal Building Products - Bristol has more employees than the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.7 0.6 3 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 0.6 1 1 0
2016 0.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · TN · Bristol

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 57 employers in Bristol, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harbec 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maxwell Chase Technologies, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Schofield 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southco, inc. - Concordville 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Pictsweet Company - Corporate Office 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE K252-M001 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Channel 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cardinal Health Tech Park 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Regional Medical Center 1,620 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ballad Health- Bristol Regional Medical Center 1,155 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 620 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR 620 291 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Contract Furnishers 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR General Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Veitsch-Radex America, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Twin Falls Med 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kem Krest - Mag1 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE redi-Group North America 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Popcorn Company 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 3 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.