Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Michigan

Royal Park

Zeeland, MI · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Royal Park runs at 383% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade F.

Royal Park: 11.5 TCR = 383% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Royal Park safety composite

Royal Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Royal Park: 6.2 → 14.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 33.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.61× in 2023

Royal Park's TCR rose 7.8 from 6.2 in 2016 to 14.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 33.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Zeeland, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 383% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #200/210
  • PHOTO New York Botanical G…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New York Botanical Garden (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Royal Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Royal Park averages 11.5 TCR (383% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Royal Park TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=13.2 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=33.9 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=14 · BLS 3.0

Where Royal Park falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #200 safest of 210 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Michigan.

Royal Park (35 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Royal Park
Royal Park (35 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Royal Park has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.0 7.0 2 0 0
2022 7.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 33.9 27.1 5 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.1 11.1 2 0 0
2018 6.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 13.2 6.6 2 0 0
2016 6.2 6.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · MI · Zeeland

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Zeeland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New York Botanical Garden 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calif Maritime Acad * 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calvin College 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covenant College* 11.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heeren, LLC - 42 North Apples 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harbor Farmz, North LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willow Point Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE POWER & UTILITIES OPERATIONS - ROB 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR MillerKnoll Main Site 1,745 FTE
CITY-NEAR Herman Miller Main Site 1,711 FTE
CITY-NEAR US MI Zeeland Centennial 1,511 FTE
CITY-NEAR US MI Zeeland Centennial East 1,384 FTE
NAT-TCR Newark Liberty International Airport 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1001 - Park City 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Tacoma Roofing & Waterproofing 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Erving Industries, Inc. 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE VRS Austin, TX 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE VRS Sacramento, CA 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ponca City Discount Food 419 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cost Plus 778 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.