Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Texas

Royal Vista Inc.

Liberty Hill, TX · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Royal Vista Inc. runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Royal Vista Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 76% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Royal Vista Inc. safety composite

Royal Vista Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Royal Vista Inc. injury rate improved

Royal Vista Inc.'s TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Liberty Hill, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #102/194
  • PHOTO Garney Pacific, Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Garney Pacific, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Royal Vista Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Royal Vista Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (76% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Royal Vista Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=4 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Royal Vista Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 194 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Texas.

Royal Vista Inc. (35 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Royal Vista Inc.
Royal Vista Inc. (35 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Royal Vista Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2018 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2017 7.7 7.7 4 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TX · Liberty Hill

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 21 employers in Liberty Hill, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Garney Pacific, Inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BURNSCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BATES UTILITY COMPANY, INC. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DNT Construction LLC 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southwest Feedyard 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE CDF Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. - Marion, TX 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Growers Select Produce, Inc. 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR C. C. Carlton Industries Ltd 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capitol Concrete Contractors, Inc. 236 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baker Triangle Austin 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithko TX, LLC 184 FTE
NAT-TCR Design Electric Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridgewood Rehabilitation & Care Center 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt Retail Specialties, LLC East Greenville, PA 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hangar 2 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE FALA Technologies 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Pallet and Crating LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulf Coast Social Services 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE CESA Contractors, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.