611691 Exam Preparation and Tutoring · California

RP San Francisco Bay Area

Oakland, CA · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RP San Francisco Bay Area runs at 1129% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical 611691 Exam Preparation and Tutoring workplace, earning a grade F.

RP San Francisco Bay Area: 15.8 TCR = 1129% of 611691 Exam Preparation and Tutoring BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RP San Francisco Bay Area safety composite

RP San Francisco Bay Area scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.3

2022→2024

RP San Francisco Bay Area injury rate improved

RP San Francisco Bay Area's TCR fell 14.3 from 24.2 in 2022 to 9.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 24.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=24.2 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=9.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611691 · Oakland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.8 · 1129% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO RP North Texas
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RP North Texas (1.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

RP San Francisco Bay Area in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RP San Francisco Bay Area averages 15.8 TCR (1129% of the 611691 Exam Preparation and Tutoring BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RP San Francisco Bay Area TCR series: 2022=24.2 · 2023=13.3 · 2024=9.9 · BLS 1.4

Where RP San Francisco Bay Area falls in its industry

17 611691 Exam Preparation and Tu establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 611691 Exam Preparation and Tu employers in California.

RP San Francisco Bay Area (37 employees, TCR 15.8) among 10 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 6.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 11 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate RP North TexasAdult and Alternative Learning CenterRP New York1200 Washington-MinneapolisRP TulsaThink TogetherFACTS Education CorporationRP NationalDay School PittsburghRP Los AngelesRP San Francisco Bay Area
RP San Francisco Bay Area (37 employees, TCR 15.8) among 10 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 6.5

RP San Francisco Bay Area has fewer employees than the 611691 Exam Preparation and Tutoring median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 13.3 0.0 0 5 0
2022 24.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611691 · CA · Oakland

17 611691 Exam Preparation and Tutoring employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 458 employers in Oakland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RP North Texas 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RP Colorado 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR RP New York 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Day School Pittsburgh 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KP Spraying LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN - 01 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberlina Shop 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakland Unified School District 4,473 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02120301 4,408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02620301 3,210 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02620301 2,922 FTE
NAT-TCR Southview Sr. Living - Eden Prairie Senior Living 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Aurora 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Clearwater Health & Rehabilitation of Cascadia 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Piana Nonwovens AZ LLC 15.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memphis Shades, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Douglas Manufacturing Co., Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Groton Public Library 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE NG Resources 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.