Curbs and street gutters, highway, road and street, construction · California

Rr Pacific Construction

Woodland, CA · ~65 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rr Pacific Construction runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Curbs and street gutters, highway, road and street, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Rr Pacific Construction: 5.9 TCR = 209% of Curbs and street gutters, highway, road and street, construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rr Pacific Construction safety composite

Rr Pacific Construction scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rr Pacific Construction: 0.0 → 7.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 7.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Rr Pacific Construction's TCR rose 7.9 from 0.0 in 2020 to 7.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Woodland, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 209% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #495/551
  • PHOTO American Bridge Comp…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Bridge Company - 482310 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rr Pacific Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rr Pacific Construction averages 5.9 TCR (209% of the Curbs and street gutters, highway, road and street, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rr Pacific Construction TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=7.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Rr Pacific Construction falls in its industry

4,078 Curbs and street gutters, high establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #495 safest of 551 Curbs and street gutters, high employers in California.

Rr Pacific Construction (65 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Rr Pacific Construction
Rr Pacific Construction (65 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Rr Pacific Construction has fewer employees than the Curbs and street gutters, highway, road median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.9 7.9 5 1 0
2023 6.4 3.9 5 0 0
2022 7.6 5.0 6 0 0
2021 7.4 7.4 5 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · Woodland

4,078 Curbs and street gutters, highway, road and street, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 172 employers in Woodland, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Bridge Company - 482310 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeside Industries - Greater Seattle 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAB Construction 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nyleve Bridge Corp. 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE SunnySlope Tree Farm, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Nursery 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE De Jager Farms, Inc. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Demler Enterprises, LLC 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 800 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Woodland CA DC 1,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0555 - Sacramento DC 1,196 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030173 820 FTE
NAT-TCR Casella Waste - Peabody Hauling 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bernatello's Pizza, Inc 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR All American Turf Beauty, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 3306 - South Burlington 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anderson Pump Service Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Darling Ingredients: Grapeland 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pulcra Chemicals, LLC 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bestmark National LLC 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.