Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

R&T Mechanical, Inc.

Marietta, PA · ~56 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R&T Mechanical, Inc. runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

R&T Mechanical, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R&T Mechanical, Inc. safety composite

R&T Mechanical, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

R&T Mechanical, Inc. held a steady TCR band

R&T Mechanical, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 1.6 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Marietta, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/68
  • PHOTO Shop/Office TFC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shop/Office TFC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

R&T Mechanical, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R&T Mechanical, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R&T Mechanical, Inc. TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=0 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where R&T Mechanical, Inc. falls in its industry

1,158 Air cowls, sheet metal (except establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 68 Air cowls, sheet metal (except employers in Pennsylvania.

R&T Mechanical, Inc. (56 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate R&T Mechanical, Inc.
R&T Mechanical, Inc. (56 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

R&T Mechanical, Inc. has fewer employees than the Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · PA · Marietta

1,158 Air cowls, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 14 employers in Marietta, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shop/Office TFC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR R.F. Knox Company, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&B Sheet Metal Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ALSM 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Mt. Pleasant 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Chester Service Building 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ginger Hill 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infinity Custom Homes LP 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armstrong World Industries - Marietta Ceiling Plant 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSK Vaccines Marietta, PA 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armstrong World Industries 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR Armstrong - Marietta 333 FTE
NAT-TCR Samson - Lafayette 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CVI Laser Optics 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ideal Builders, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 3409 - Jackson Hole 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Holiday Beach Mechanical 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oasis Gin, Inc 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hamilton Township Department of Water Pollution Control (Sewer) 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodward Nursing Center, LLC dba Woodward Skilled Nursing and Therapy 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.