Low voltage electrical work · California

RTS Systems & Design LLC

Pleasanton, CA · ~46 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RTS Systems & Design LLC runs at 83% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade C.

RTS Systems & Design LLC: 2.3 TCR = 83% of Low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RTS Systems & Design LLC safety composite

RTS Systems & Design LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

RTS Systems & Design LLC held a steady TCR band

RTS Systems & Design LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=11.6 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Pleasanton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 83% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #225/548
  • PHOTO NC/SC (50)
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NC/SC (50) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

RTS Systems & Design LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RTS Systems & Design LLC averages 2.3 TCR (83% of the Low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RTS Systems & Design LLC TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=11.6 · 2019=5 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where RTS Systems & Design LLC falls in its industry

4,550 Low voltage electrical work establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #225 safest of 548 Low voltage electrical work employers in California.

RTS Systems & Design LLC (46 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate RTS Systems & Design LLC
RTS Systems & Design LLC (46 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

RTS Systems & Design LLC has fewer employees than the Low voltage electrical work median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 0 1 0
2019 5.0 5.0 3 0 0
2018 11.6 9.3 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Pleasanton

4,550 Low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NC/SC (50) 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Instrumentation & Control Systems Engineering, Inc 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR H&W Electrical Corporation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Area Energy & Electric, Inc. 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matteoli Brothers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE IMR Farms-San Miguel 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE G&G Berry Farms 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pitigliano Farm Services, Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR American Steel & Aluminum Co., Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marvin Keller Trucking 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grady Brothers, Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Jayhawk Fire Sprinkler Co Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE DBA Falkner Farms 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulfstream #808 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinto 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boltswitch, Inc. 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.