Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants · Colorado

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc.

Loveland, CO · ~76 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. runs at 178% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc.: 5.9 TCR = 178% of Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. safety composite

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.4

2018→2024

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 5.4 from 9.7 in 2018 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.7 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331420 · Loveland, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.9 · 178% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK P27
  • PHOTO Freeport McMoRan Ref…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Freeport McMoRan Refinery (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. averages 5.9 TCR (178% of the Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. TCR series: 2018=9.7 · 2019=8.8 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. falls in its industry

198 Wire, copper (e.g., armored, establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. (76 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rubadue Wire Co., Inc.
Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. (76 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Rubadue Wire Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 4.2 1 1 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 7.2 7.2 5 2 0
2021 7.1 5.9 6 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2019 8.8 5.9 4 2 0
2018 9.7 9.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331420 · CO · Loveland

198 Wire, copper (e.g., armored, bare, insulated), made from purchased copper in wire drawing plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 188 employers in Loveland, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Freeport McMoRan Refinery 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cambridge Lee Industries - Reading 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Olin Brass - Somers Thin Strip 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howell Metal Company 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastern Colorado Well Service 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ensign Testing Services (USA) Inc. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valentia Service Center 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE I-25 North 061802 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Center of the Rockies 1,357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hach Company 1,291 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hach Loveland 1,281 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6019 937 FTE
NAT-TCR Trienda Holdings, LLC. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2404 - Henderson Lake Mead Pkwy 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oregon Coast Aquarium 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Elders Electric Co 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Broady-Campbell Inc 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE T&J Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Super Electric Construction Company 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jonco Die Co MN 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.