Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Illinois

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc.

Bradley, IL · ~19 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 90% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. safety composite

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc.: 0.0 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.46× in 2024

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc.'s TCR rose 6.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Bradley, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 90% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #25/58
  • PHOTO VS - IL
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VS - IL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (90% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=10.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 2.8

Where Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 58 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Illinois.

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. (19 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc.
Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. (19 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Ruben E. Smith Const. and R&R, Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 6.2 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 10.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · IL · Bradley

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 22 employers in Bradley, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VS - IL 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KCK Utility Construction 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bali Construction, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frost Ave Service Center 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gingerich Farms Partnerships 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tolono Research 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE PharmaCann Hillcrest 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Morgan Acres, LLC. 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSL Behring LLC 1,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradley-Bourbonnais CHSD #307 296 FTE
CITY-NEAR 301 - Bradley 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bradley SD #61 262 FTE
NAT-TCR Team Mechanical of Texas, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Scott Wesney Construction LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crider & Crider, Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #5817 2.5 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.