Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors · California

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ)

San Carlos, CA · ~45 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ): 1.2 TCR = 42% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) safety composite

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) held a steady TCR band

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ)'s TCR held near 0.1 from 2.0 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.0 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · San Carlos, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #18/78
  • PHOTO Albu & Associates, I…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Albu & Associates, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) averages 1.2 TCR (42% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=2.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 78 Industrial building (except wa employers in California.

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) (45 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ)
Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) (45 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Rudolph and Sletten Mani Office (HQ) has fewer employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · CA · San Carlos

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 57 employers in San Carlos, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Albu & Associates, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Puerto Rico All Sites 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mammoth Prefab LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apicore US LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Salinas Transplant Company 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terra Firma Farm 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald Beeman Farm 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Mist Farms, LP 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rudolph and Sletten 686 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (30507) 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palo Alto Medical Foundation (378-10145) 387 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Mateo County Transit District 293 FTE
NAT-TCR 973 - North Dartmouth 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern A-1 Services - All Locations 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops Corporate 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR EMD Performance Materials 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Refrigeration Inc. (400) 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Beacon Hotel 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE the QMC Group 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Don Hatting Inc 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.