Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Running with Lions Logistics

San Diego, CA · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.8
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Running with Lions Logistics runs at 258% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Running with Lions Logistics: 16.8 TCR = 258% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Running with Lions Logistics safety composite

Running with Lions Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 7.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.9

2022→2024

Running with Lions Logistics injury rate improved

Running with Lions Logistics's TCR fell 10.9 from 20.6 in 2022 to 9.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=20.6 · 2023=20.1 · 2024=9.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.8 · 258% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #573/710
  • PHOTO WACO (TXWAC)
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WACO (TXWAC) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Running with Lions Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Running with Lions Logistics averages 16.8 TCR (258% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Running with Lions Logistics TCR series: 2022=20.6 · 2023=20.1 · 2024=9.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Running with Lions Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #573 safest of 710 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in California.

Running with Lions Logistics (44 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Running with Lions Logistics
Running with Lions Logistics (44 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Running with Lions Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.7 7.8 5 0 0
2023 20.1 15.6 9 0 0
2022 20.6 17.6 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · San Diego

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WACO (TXWAC) 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 917480000 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 729 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR COBOU - BOULDER 16.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Firebaugh 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boutonnet Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Coast Vineyards 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE FESTIVAL FARMS 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Spokane-N Nevada #068 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Nursery - Newark 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR QLS Sarver 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-02552 16.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Detroit 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garden View Care Center 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. R. Wilson Construction Co., Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheeling Service Center 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.