Landscaping services (except planning) · Maryland

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia

Silver Spring, MD · ~54 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Landscaping services (except planning) workplace, earning a grade C.

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia: 4.6 TCR = 102% of Landscaping services (except planning) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia safety composite

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2022

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia injury rate improved

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.7 in 2016 to 1.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=12.5 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Silver Spring, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.6 · 102% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #27/59
  • PHOTO WLC-RC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WLC-RC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia averages 4.6 TCR (102% of the Landscaping services (except planning) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=12.5 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia falls in its industry

2,875 Landscaping services (except p establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 59 Landscaping services (except p employers in Maryland.

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia (54 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia
Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia (54 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Ruppert Landscape - District of Columbia has more employees than the Landscaping services (except planning) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2021 5.4 1.3 4 0 0
2020 12.5 0.0 7 0 0
2019 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2018 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MD · Silver Spring

2,875 Landscaping services (except planning) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 160 employers in Silver Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WLC-RC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parker Interior Plantscape 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shenandoah Landscape Services, Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5022 - Hagerstown 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-25 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conowingo 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE FiberPlus, Inc. 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring 3,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring-HCH-MD 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare, Inc., d/b/a Adventist HealthCare White Oak Medical Center 1,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riderwood Village 1,375 FTE
NAT-TCR Warren County Concrete 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR University Hospital Summerville 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HG646 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Arden Courts of South Holland 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG504 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG832 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Enfield Department of Custodial Services 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG1038 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.