Landscaping services (except planning) · Georgia

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn

Lilburn, GA · ~152 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Landscaping services (except planning) workplace, earning a grade A.

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn: 2.1 TCR = 47% of Landscaping services (except planning) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn safety composite

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Lilburn, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.1 · 47% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #17/100
  • PHOTO Horizon Environmenta…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Horizon Environmental Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn averages 2.1 TCR (47% of the Landscaping services (except planning) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.2 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn falls in its industry

2,875 Landscaping services (except p establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 100 Landscaping services (except p employers in Georgia.

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn (152 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn
Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn (152 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Ruppert Landscape - Lilburn has more employees than the Landscaping services (except planning) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2023 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2022 2.4 0.8 3 0 0
2021 4.6 3.5 8 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 3 0 0
2019 2.8 1.1 5 0 0
2018 2.7 2.0 4 0 0
2017 2.2 0.7 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · GA · Lilburn

2,875 Landscaping services (except planning) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 42 employers in Lilburn, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Horizon Environmental Services, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruppert Landscape - Alexandria 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franz Witte Landscape Contracting, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATE072 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AGLC Clayton Service Center 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE SGA Division 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premier Elevator Co. Inc. 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premium Peanut 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1373 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1373 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0564 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0640 LOWE S OF STONE MOUNTAIN GA. 153 FTE
NAT-TCR Ruppert Landscape - Alexandria 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CORP-System Wide 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Canyon 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nowak Construction Co., Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eldridge Electric Company 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE JSP - Tullahoma 2 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Heating & Cooling 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA FL Orlando Plant 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.