Landscaping services (except planning) · Maryland

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh

Essex, MD · ~61 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Landscaping services (except planning) workplace, earning a grade C.

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh: 5.2 TCR = 115% of Landscaping services (except planning) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh safety composite

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2024

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh injury rate improved

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh's TCR fell 2.6 from 4.2 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.2 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Essex, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.2 · 115% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #37/59
  • PHOTO 5024 - Binghamton
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5024 - Binghamton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh averages 5.2 TCR (115% of the Landscaping services (except planning) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=7.6 · 2023=3 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh falls in its industry

2,875 Landscaping services (except p establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 59 Landscaping services (except p employers in Maryland.

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh (61 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh
Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh (61 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Ruppert Landscape - White Marsh has more employees than the Landscaping services (except planning) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.0 1.5 2 0 0
2022 7.6 4.6 5 0 0
2021 4.8 1.6 3 0 0
2020 3.4 1.7 2 0 0
2019 11.3 4.8 7 0 0
2018 5.4 3.6 3 0 0
2017 4.2 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MD · Essex

2,875 Landscaping services (except planning) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 19 employers in Essex, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5024 - Binghamton 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ruppert Landscape - Dulles 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landscaping Services, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR English Gardens Landscape- Plymouth 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cossentino Contracting Co., Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infrastructure Riverdale 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE MACHADO CONSTRUCTION 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mohawk Bridge & Iron, Inc. 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DBA3 733 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DBA3 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR 01653 - STORE # 1653 ESSEX 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flavor & Fragrance Specialties 85 FTE
NAT-TCR Lexington KY 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Elementary 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Albert Lea 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S02888 - Brem-Air Disposal 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wenzel Metal Spinning, Inc. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Company, LLC (New Orleans) 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Millwork, Inc. - Headquarters 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Discovery Village at Tampa Palms 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.