MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Illinois

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP

Aurora, IL · ~264 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP: 3.3 TCR = 86% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP safety composite

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2021→2024

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP injury rate improved

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP's TCR fell 3.1 from 4.1 in 2021 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=4.1 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Aurora, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #53/86
  • PHOTO Route 112 Building 6
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~264 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Route 112 Building 6 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP averages 3.3 TCR (86% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP TCR series: 2021=4.1 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=1.5 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.8

Where Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 86 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Illinois.

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP (264 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP
Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP (264 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Rush Copley Medical Group, NFP has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 1.5 1.0 2 1 0
2022 6.5 4.5 5 8 0
2021 4.1 1.5 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · IL · Aurora

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 325 employers in Aurora, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Route 112 Building 6 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Valley Cardiology Associates 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR South University Clinic 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EPPA Unity Hospital 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Glen Ellyn Reporting Center 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northbrook 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flinn Scientific 264 FTE
STATE-SIZE IL014 264 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Prairie School District 204 3,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR Factor Aurora 2,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush Copley Medical Center, Inc. 2,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR ANDY FRAIN SERVICES INC 2,100 FTE
NAT-TCR Village Bowl 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Pipeline Construction Company 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR JB Bostick Ventures 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake St. Clair Metropark 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seneca Foods Corporation 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1186 - Salem Broadway 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2138 - Massaponax 264 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boston Scientific Minnetonka 264 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.