Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Alabama

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin

Heflin, AL · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin safety composite

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2016→2019

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin injury rate improved

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=11.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Heflin, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/22
  • PHOTO IL065 Mount Olive Co…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IL065 Mount Olive Container (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=11.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 22 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Alabama.

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin (38 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin
Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin (38 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Rusken Packaging Oxford/Heflin has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.5 8.6 4 0 0
2016 4.4 4.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · AL · Heflin

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 16 employers in Heflin, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IL065 Mount Olive Container 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Packaging - Phoenix, AZ 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Gilroy Container 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LA110 West Monroe Container 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milstead Farm Group, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Division Selma Office 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eufaula State Docks Road Complex 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mobile Division Schillingers Road 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR L.E. Bell Construction Co., Inc. 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwire Heflin 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forte Power Systems 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asimpa LLC 163 FTE
NAT-TCR M/V Aleutian Falcon 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clayton Homes Waycross 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GA305 Sterling Sawmill 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rural Health Group 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Birko Corporation - Equipment Division 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texstar - Corpus Christi 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmetto Health Richland - PSC Laurel 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stryker Demolition & Environmental Services, LLC 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.