Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · California

Rusnak Porsche Westlake

Thousand Oaks, CA · ~52 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rusnak Porsche Westlake runs at 399% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade F.

Rusnak Porsche Westlake: 13.6 TCR = 399% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rusnak Porsche Westlake safety composite

Rusnak Porsche Westlake scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rusnak Porsche Westlake: 0.0 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 36.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2024

Rusnak Porsche Westlake's TCR rose 11.2 from 0.0 in 2018 to 11.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 36.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Thousand Oaks, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 399% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #288/301
  • PHOTO Hart Buick GMC Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hart Buick GMC Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rusnak Porsche Westlake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rusnak Porsche Westlake averages 13.6 TCR (399% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rusnak Porsche Westlake TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=6 · 2020=9.3 · 2022=36.5 · 2023=18.4 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.4

Where Rusnak Porsche Westlake falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #288 safest of 301 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in California.

Rusnak Porsche Westlake (52 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rusnak Porsche Westlake
Rusnak Porsche Westlake (52 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Rusnak Porsche Westlake has fewer employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 7.5 3 3 0
2023 18.4 14.7 5 5 0
2022 36.5 35.1 2 24 0
2020 9.3 9.3 3 2 0
2019 6.0 4.8 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · CA · Thousand Oaks

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Thousand Oaks, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hart Buick GMC Inc 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2158 13.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR W&D Imports Inc dba Davis Honda 13.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Haddad Collision Center 13.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phil Foster Ranch 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Ivanhoe 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brassfield Estate Vineyard 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amgen Inc. (Thousand Oaks, CA) 5,792 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amgen USA (Sales - Flex workers) 2,803 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 472 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Robles Hospital and Medical Center 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR National Coney Island - Masonic 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vision Stairways and Millwork 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN2 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crescent Crown Distributing_Surprise 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aberdeen Crossings by New Perspective 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Wayne Roofing A Tecta America Company, LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Machine Technologies, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baylor Scott & White Emergency Hospital Burleson 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.