Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers · Alabama

Russell Forest Products, Inc

Decatur, AL · ~68 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Russell Forest Products, Inc runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Russell Forest Products, Inc: 2.3 TCR = 105% of Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Russell Forest Products, Inc safety composite

Russell Forest Products, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2019→2024

Russell Forest Products, Inc injury rate improved

Russell Forest Products, Inc's TCR fell 2.9 from 4.4 in 2019 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.4 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · Decatur, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 105% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #8/17
  • PHOTO U.S. Lumber - Baltim…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: U.S. Lumber - Baltimore (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Russell Forest Products, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Russell Forest Products, Inc averages 2.3 TCR (105% of the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Russell Forest Products, Inc TCR series: 2019=4.4 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Russell Forest Products, Inc falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 17 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finishe employers in Alabama.

Russell Forest Products, Inc (68 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Russell Forest Products, Inc
Russell Forest Products, Inc (68 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Russell Forest Products, Inc has more employees than the Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.1 1.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 4.4 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · AL · Decatur

1,225 Lumber (e.g., dressed, finished, rough) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 239 employers in Decatur, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR U.S. Lumber - Baltimore 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BlueLinx Corporation Elkhart 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duluth GA DC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MO Drywall - Hazelwood 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pea River Electric Cooperative 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE LSAM Pan Line I 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hagan Fences 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ben Mar Hosiery Inc. 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain - Decatur 1,450 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decatur processing plant 885 FTE
CITY-NEAR ULA-Decatur 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Decatur Fresh Plant 671 FTE
NAT-TCR Wood Mulch Products, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bunkie Service Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DayGlo Color Cleveland Facility 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Foam - Dowagiac 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ozarks Food Harvest 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE The VERVE Hotel 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bissinger & Stein 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meigs Center Ltd 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.