Resurfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway · Pennsylvania

Russell Standard

Pittsburgh, PA · ~190 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Russell Standard runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Resurfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway workplace, earning a grade B.

Russell Standard: 2.0 TCR = 73% of Resurfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Russell Standard safety composite

Russell Standard scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Russell Standard: 1.1 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2024

Russell Standard's TCR rose 2.0 from 1.1 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 73% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #46/196
  • PHOTO LTM, Incorporated db…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LTM, Incorporated dba Knife River Materials Roseburg (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Russell Standard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Russell Standard averages 2.0 TCR (73% of the Resurfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Russell Standard TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Russell Standard falls in its industry

4,078 Resurfacing, highway, road, st establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 196 Resurfacing, highway, road, st employers in Pennsylvania.

Russell Standard (190 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Russell Standard
Russell Standard (190 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Russell Standard has more employees than the Resurfacing, highway, road, street, brid median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.3 7 0 0
2023 1.4 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2020 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 0 1 0
2017 2.4 2.0 6 0 0
2016 1.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,078 Resurfacing, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LTM, Incorporated dba Knife River Materials Roseburg 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benton County - Public Works 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Department of Public Works, Bureau of Contract Administration, West Valley Municipal Building 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rieth-Riley - Benton Harbor 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Giorgio Chester 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montoursville Office, Plant and Shop 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE E&R Monroeville 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE CARLISLE PA PLANT 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Sandy 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Phipps Neighborhoods Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Schaefer Systems International, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Max Foote Construction, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Care One at Essex Park 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Heater Corp 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Occasions Group - ID - 0156-IDRE1 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Press - MN - 0016 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.