Skilled nursing facilities · Vermont

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland

Rutland, VT · ~140 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland: 12.1 TCR = 186% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland safety composite

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2018

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland injury rate improved

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland's TCR fell 2.7 from 13.4 in 2016 to 10.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 13.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.4 · 2018=10.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Rutland, VT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 12.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #29/34
  • PHOTO Laurel Brook Operato…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Laurel Brook Operator, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Vermont employers → · Look up another →

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland averages 12.1 TCR (186% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland TCR series: 2016=13.4 · 2018=10.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Vermont alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 34 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Vermont.

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland (140 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland
Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland (140 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Rutland Crossings, LLC dba The Pines at Rutland has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 10.7 9.9 13 0 0
2016 13.4 10.3 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · VT · Rutland

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,065 rated employers in Vermont with headcount on file · 65 employers in Rutland, VT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Laurel Brook Operator, LLC 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgeview Estates 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 834 WEST READING NURSING REHAB 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Escondido 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 8397 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1913 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5472-NAI-0033-0033-00615 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bromley Mountain Resort 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08306 - Store # 8306 Rutland 202 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8306 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Casella Corporate Office 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Pines Of Rutland 164 FTE
NAT-TCR 280 - Brown County Youth 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bobcat of Dallas- Fort Worth 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Specialty Fulfillment : ATL8 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Amzl : Dsf4 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Diversicare of Seneca Place 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730043-CS 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Guest House Rehabilitation Center 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Husqvarna Forestry ProductsN.A. Inc. Howard St 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.