Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) · North Carolina

R.W. S. Construction, Inc.

Providence, NC · ~156 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R.W. S. Construction, Inc. runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade A.

R.W. S. Construction, Inc.: 0.3 TCR = 11% of Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R.W. S. Construction, Inc. safety composite

R.W. S. Construction, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

R.W. S. Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

R.W. S. Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 0.7 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.7 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Providence, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/36
  • PHOTO 112280-GOLDEN PASS LNG
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 112280-GOLDEN PASS LNG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

R.W. S. Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R.W. S. Construction, Inc. averages 0.3 TCR (11% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R.W. S. Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.7 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 2.9

Where R.W. S. Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

924 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 36 Addition, alteration and renov employers in North Carolina.

R.W. S. Construction, Inc. (156 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate R.W. S. Construction, Inc.
R.W. S. Construction, Inc. (156 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

R.W. S. Construction, Inc. has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, gen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 1 0
2017 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2016 0.7 0.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · NC · Providence

924 Addition, alteration and renovation, general contractors, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 112280-GOLDEN PASS LNG 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apres Management, Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR GMI 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCL Industrial Construction Co US PICCO District 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Carolina Electric Cooperatives 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE I40/440 - Project 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schindler Clinton Escalator Plant 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Mooresville 156 FTE
NAT-TCR Set Stch 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Henderson - D090 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR J. E. Johnson Inc. 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hobby-Q 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ampacet Corp Terre Haute 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #4012 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boulevard Rehabilitation Center 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Health Services of Bluewater Bay, LLC 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.