Habilitation job counseling and training, vocational · California

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North

Anaheim, CA · ~31 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North runs at 475% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Habilitation job counseling and training, vocational workplace, earning a grade F.

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North: 18.1 TCR = 475% of Habilitation job counseling and training, vocational BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North safety composite

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−24.8

2017→2019

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North injury rate improved

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North's TCR fell 24.8 from 35.9 in 2017 to 11.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 35.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=35.9 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=11.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.1 · 475% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #136/141
  • PHOTO Kaneohe Bay Commissary
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kaneohe Bay Commissary (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North averages 18.1 TCR (475% of the Habilitation job counseling and training, vocational BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North TCR series: 2017=35.9 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=11.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North falls in its industry

1,455 Habilitation job counseling an establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 141 Habilitation job counseling an employers in California.

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North (31 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North
Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North (31 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Rws Ca Ornge Cnty Tanf North has fewer employees than the Habilitation job counseling and training median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.1 8.9 5 0 0
2018 7.2 7.2 1 0 0
2017 35.9 35.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · CA · Anaheim

1,455 Habilitation job counseling and training, vocational employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kaneohe Bay Commissary 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cascade Store 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgeport Food 18.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seabird Enterprises 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE GCF 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nielsen Farms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Star Nurseries LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Progressive Growers Inc 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 1302 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Exterior Source of Tidewater 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Edgewood Mandan LLC 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pbi-Ground Ops 18.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-Davidson-RTC USA 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terminix Service, Inc. Bluffton 62- 24 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-New England District : SVC-Portland ME-USA 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Valley Dairy Corp. 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.