General freight trucking, local · New Hampshire

S & J Transportation Services Inc

Lee, NH · ~79 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S & J Transportation Services Inc runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade D.

S & J Transportation Services Inc: 7.2 TCR = 159% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S & J Transportation Services Inc safety composite

S & J Transportation Services Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

S & J Transportation Services Inc: 4.0 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2024

S & J Transportation Services Inc's TCR rose 0.7 from 4.0 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Lee, NH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 159% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO TXCAV - HOUSTON
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 55 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TXCAV - HOUSTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

S & J Transportation Services Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S & J Transportation Services Inc averages 7.2 TCR (159% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S & J Transportation Services Inc TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=10.7 · 2018=13.2 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=9.9 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 4.5

Where S & J Transportation Services Inc falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 General freight trucking, loca employers in New Hampshire.

S & J Transportation Services Inc (79 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate S & J Transportation Services Inc
S & J Transportation Services Inc (79 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

S & J Transportation Services Inc has more employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 3.1 3 0 0
2023 9.9 8.5 7 0 0
2022 4.2 2.8 3 0 0
2021 10.2 10.2 7 0 0
2020 4.5 4.5 4 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 3 0 0
2018 13.2 12.2 13 0 0
2017 10.7 9.7 11 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · NH · Lee

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 3 employers in Lee, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TXCAV - HOUSTON 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TXDSD - DALLAS (AIRPORT) EWW 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Island Movers - HHD 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CACMR - LOS ANGELES 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Builders Installed Products #340 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Churchill Medical Systems Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Bond Building Products - Portsmouth 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE CounterGravity Directional Cast Operations (DCO) 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #51 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lee NH 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Opequon Water Reclamation Facility 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Bardstown, LLC- Colonial 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ft. Wayne ARC 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Manitowoc 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Senior Living at Hampton 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE E/M Coating Services 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Century Foundry Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Louisiana Water Company 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.