Employer · Florida

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County

Hobe Sound, FL · ~224 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade D.

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County: 3.2 TCR = 123% of industry BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County safety composite

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County: 1.7 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.66× in 2024

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.7 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Hobe Sound, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.2 · 123% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #44/155
  • PHOTO S04085 - WM of Kenne…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S04085 - WM of Kennewick (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County averages 3.2 TCR (123% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=11.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.6

Where S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County falls in its industry

2,322 industry establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 155 industry employers in Florida.

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County (224 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County
S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County (224 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

S03058 - Waste Management of Martin County has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.1 6 0 0
2023 3.5 3.1 8 0 0
2022 1.7 1.7 4 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2020 3.9 3.0 9 0 0
2019 2.6 1.7 6 0 0
2018 11.7 0.0 4 22 0
2017 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2016 1.7 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · FL · Hobe Sound

2,322 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 23 employers in Hobe Sound, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S04085 - WM of Kennewick 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05121 - Health Sanitation Service (HSS) 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Andover Waste LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Springs 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 051-Chipley Facility 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE fORT mYERS 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 0311 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 1431 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Coast Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare 173 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROOD LANDSCAPE LLC 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0571 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1585 118 FTE
NAT-TCR S04085 - WM of Kennewick 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Merill Area Public Schools 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 30 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Farms Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ingardia Bros. Produce Inc. 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE WG Park City Resort & Spa - UT03 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monoflo International Inc. 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port Hueneme 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.